Author Topic: 2nd ed amaterasu question  (Read 3356 times)

Offline pinksuezo

  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 383
  • Karma: +5/-1
2nd ed amaterasu question
« on: July 09, 2007, 01:03:07 PM »
ahoy hoy.
in mutantpedia there's a fan created rule set for 2nd edition: Mishima Forces of War.

regarding amaterasu, it gives stats for her as such:
 
                   CC        RC   PW    LD   AC   W   ST   MV    A     S   CO      
Amaterasu   12        10    13     16    3     2     8    7.5    8     2   76   
Equipment:
2 Katana, 1 MP
Special Abilities:
Stalking, Enhanced Charge, Camouflage, First Strike, Deadly Stroke, 2 Extra CC Attacks


Does the MV of 7.5 sound right at all or is it an obvious typo? Sounds kinda brutal if it isnt really just 3. And i posted all her stats so you can judge for yourselves if cost and other skills match, taking into account the 7.5 MV.  What do you guys think?
REPORT HERESY. IT'S YOUR DUTY.

In Nomine Cardinalis

Wedge

  • Guest
Re: 2nd ed amaterasu question
« Reply #1 on: July 09, 2007, 01:34:19 PM »
I haven't played 2nd in a long time but I am certain that is a typo.  The fastest model in the game is a vehicle at 6".  That would be ridiculous for her to run that fast.  I would bet her move is 3".

Offline Dr. Nick

  • Member Emeritus
  • *****
  • Posts: 1054
  • Karma: +48/-16
Re: 2nd ed amaterasu question
« Reply #2 on: July 09, 2007, 10:45:54 PM »
Quote
Does the MV of 7.5 sound right at all or is it an obvious typo?

it is in cm

wz was in this in the german version.

1 inch ~ 2,5 cm

-> 7,5 = 3
"Donīt anticipate outcome. Await the unfolding of events. Remain in the moment."

Offline pinksuezo

  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 383
  • Karma: +5/-1
Re: 2nd ed amaterasu question
« Reply #3 on: July 10, 2007, 12:31:44 AM »
ah very cool.  thanks both.
REPORT HERESY. IT'S YOUR DUTY.

In Nomine Cardinalis

Offline brynolf

  • Full Member
  • **
  • Posts: 152
  • Karma: +5/-0
Re: 2nd ed amaterasu question
« Reply #4 on: November 20, 2007, 04:36:38 PM »
it is in cm

wz was in this in the german version.

1 inch ~ 2,5 cm

-> 7,5 = 3

That's interesting, because in the Swedish versions, 1" = 3cm... I know 2,5 is more correct, but shouldn't Target have kept it the same standard for all the translations?