« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Shooting priority question  (Read 3499 times)

Offline fox1

  • Journeyman
  • *
  • Posts: 28
  • Karma: +2/-0
Shooting priority question
« on: November 20, 2006, 11:52:10 AM »
I know that under the rules you must always shoot at the nearest squad etc but is there anything to allow you not to do so when the nearest squad is simply 1 man/model on his own that is being used as a "blocker" so that other troops can not be shot at, this tactic could be used quiet a lot especially if the troops shooting do not have tac sense and can not change their priority?
It justs seems a little silly that a whole squad may have to shoot at one man/model that is panicked and is not a "threat" to them and yet a squad or something just a few inches behind them is standing there waiting to just gun them down.
Thank you for any help you may be able to give.
Logged

Offline Dragon62

  • Member Emeritus
  • *****
  • Posts: 1893
  • Karma: +67/-0
Re: Shooting priority question
« Reply #1 on: November 20, 2006, 01:26:04 PM »
Only Tactical Sense per the rules.
Logged
Define Irony-A bunch of idiots dancing around on a plane to a song made famous by a band that died in a plane crash.

Homebase-New Jersey
Ebay-Dragondrake69

Offline dmcgee1

  • Board Member
  • Administrator
  • Member Emeritus
  • *****
  • Posts: 3179
  • Karma: +147/-7
  • Ask away!
Re: Shooting priority question
« Reply #2 on: November 20, 2006, 04:19:23 PM »
So, kill that lonely guy and commence to fire upon the squad behind him, thinking they're safe.  Seriously, one model can't have that many wounds.  We have never had an issue of target priority spoil a game for us - never!
Logged
If sing, sang, and sung, sink, sank, and sunk, and drink, drank, and drunk, how is it that it isn't bring, brang, and brung, think, thank and thunk, and ding, dang, and dung?

Don't even get me started about bad, badder and baddest.  Run, ran AND run...again?  C'mon!

Offline Sylvas

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 819
  • Karma: +23/-0
  • Midwest Crusader
Re: Shooting priority question
« Reply #3 on: November 20, 2006, 05:55:24 PM »
all it takes is one magic bullet and, presto, no more screener to worry about...

B...
Logged
eBay name: sylvas1970

Offline PhillySniper

  • Member Emeritus
  • *****
  • Posts: 1047
  • Karma: +84/-9
Re: Shooting priority question
« Reply #4 on: November 20, 2006, 08:45:46 PM »
You can also manuever your guys so that they dont have line of sight to the model in question. Then they are free to shoot at the next closest target. If you cant see it you cant be forced to shoot it.
Logged
Shoot First and ask questions later.

Homebase- Philadelphia
Ebay name. Phillychocolatem

Offline Dr. Nick

  • Member Emeritus
  • *****
  • Posts: 1054
  • Karma: +48/-16
Re: Shooting priority question
« Reply #5 on: November 21, 2006, 01:19:10 AM »
yeah, the rules almost force the use of blocking units to create los corridors..

just like the chariot/repeater bolt thrower tactic in WHFB

use the Strike skimmer as a tac sense device..

ugly, but ...

also, with hard cover the lone guy might hold quite some time/eat a lot of lead.. (golem of darkness...)
Logged
"Donīt anticipate outcome. Await the unfolding of events. Remain in the moment."

Offline Sylvas

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 819
  • Karma: +23/-0
  • Midwest Crusader
Re: Shooting priority question
« Reply #6 on: November 21, 2006, 02:36:07 PM »
Quote from: Aldrien on November 21, 2006, 01:19:10 AM

also, with hard cover the lone guy might hold quite some time/eat a lot of lead.. (golem of darkness...)

I don't know about that...mostly, a lone model out in the open will pretty much go down after only a few shots, no matter how tough it might be...

add cover, and you have a different story...I've had Capitol Free Marines hold an entire flank for a game just ambushing and making a nuisance of themselves...

B...
Logged
eBay name: sylvas1970

Offline dmcgee1

  • Board Member
  • Administrator
  • Member Emeritus
  • *****
  • Posts: 3179
  • Karma: +147/-7
  • Ask away!
Re: Shooting priority question
« Reply #7 on: November 21, 2006, 07:59:15 PM »
Good tactics wins over bad tactics any day of the week, and twice on Sunday.  Again, we have never had target priority ruin a game.  What's good for the goose is good for the gander, fight fire with fire, and all those other cliches that work in this instance.
Logged
If sing, sang, and sung, sink, sank, and sunk, and drink, drank, and drunk, how is it that it isn't bring, brang, and brung, think, thank and thunk, and ding, dang, and dung?

Don't even get me started about bad, badder and baddest.  Run, ran AND run...again?  C'mon!
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »