I have to jump in here. I've been a huge fan of REH since the seventies (got my first Conan novel when I was 6). I have more of a "purist" leaning, so I am not exactly impartial, but I am more open minded than most of the REHupa(fanzine) and alot of members on the Conan.com forum. I will say that I like the 1st Conan movie well enough ( it is a fun fantasy movie), but It is definitly a far cry from what Howard wrote. Now, I understand that Milius had to cram a bunch of things about Conan's life into a short amount of time for the movie, I just wish the stoyline had followed the actual history of Conan as writen by Howard!
There are only a few things in the movie that are actually from the book(s), and they are the following:
1). Conan is a barbarian from Cimmeria.
2). Conan was a slave, but only for a short time in his middle teens in Hyberborea, not vanaheim.
3). Conan's father was a blacksmith.
4). Conan was a thief in Zamora, and did climb a tower, although it was the tower of the elephant.
5). Conan did eventually become King of Aquilonia.
Everything else was either taken from Howard's KULL stories, or just plain made up. Thulsa Doom is the main protagonist in the KULL stories. Subotai is
very loosely based on "Brule the Slayer", a pictish sidekick to KULL, although he was not a thief. Everything else was made up for the movie. I will give Milius props for atleast taking stuff for the movie from other Howard stories(KULL). I will also say that the movie helped to bring people to REH and that is a good thing.
On the downside, Milius spent more on trying to get the movie to look like the Frank Frazetta book covers (Milius's words) than a tribute to Howard as was his stated intention. Don't get me wrong I'm a HUGE Frazetta fan( In fact I have a small shrine to him at my house), but this is supposed to be about
Conan's story.
I still think it was a fun movie to watch and do watch it occasionaly,...........but REH it ain't. There have been amazing strides by publishers in recent years to collect an publish REH's stories (Cona, KULL, El Borack, boxing, horror, westerns, etc.) and if you get the chance, you should really read his work. Of course this is all IMO, and people have the right to like or dislike what they will.
Thanks for reading.