I think i can disagree
. Its the most boring Force i saw for some time, yeah. Takeing only one type of warrior (what you think is the best) and than min max it ^^. Wheres the tactic and the flexebility? I dont think i need to explain again while a mixed warband with spear and axewarriors is a more flexible force than that "superior" axe only warbands of yours^^.
Btw the DAM output of a spearman is only 3 less than that off an axemen adding the polearm and the additional options wich gives it to me, thats a very effective unit.
I have a treedevil in it as well so dont see a reason it couldnt tear the warplord apart aswell(a poorly played one tho, my opponents here dont fall for that easy tricks
).
The new cheaper reapers are very effective against low armor (and high VER) units where axemen are just overkill. Their far better VER and slightly higher chances to hit (2 vs 4 hits) makes them a very interessting choice (they have a better cc as well). The Chameleon ability makes it even possible to not relay on the priestess LOS for Range protection.
For all the saved points i get a 4th very good individual into the force (highest armor and high DAM for that race) wich can make a difference as it presents a threat to most big Creatures on the field.
Conclusion
My list isnt more boring than yours, it has a wider variety of different troops (3 more^^) wich leads to a greater flexebility when encounterd on differnent tactical situations. For me flexibility on the field of battle is very important.
Sry that i dared to question your power driven list but i think it lacks flexebility